Re: IMG: Nathan's PAW 28: wet in England
- From: Nathan Wajsman <photo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: leica@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 07:30:35 +0200
Thanks David.
The finder on the E420 is surprisingly good, much better than on the
E410 I once had and also better than the finder on the Canon 20D I
once had. I am not too sensitive to finder issues, and although
nothing compares to the finder in the Leicaflex SL, I am quite happy
with the finders in the various DSLRs I have had.
Cheers,
Nathan
Nathan Wajsman
Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu
http://www.greatpix.eu
http://www.nathanfoto.com
Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog
On Jul 16, 2008, at 2:50 AM, David Young wrote:
At 15/07/2008, you wrote:
This week's pictures were all taken on Tuesday and Wednesday in
Brighton and in London, with my new (almost) pocketable outfit, the
Olympus E420 with the 25mm pancake lens.
Anyway, the weather was lousy, our flight home was delayed by more
than 2 hours, but it was still a great trip. Selected snippets are
here:
http://www.fotocycle.dk:80/paws/?page_id=149
And as always, comments and critique are welcome and appreciated.
Another fascinating series, Nathan, and I always enjoy viewing you
shots.
I am curious ... The little pancake lens is obviously very good ...
but, how do you find the 420's finder - esp. as compared to the E3's
finder?
Cheers!
---
David Young,
Logan Lake, CANADA
Limited Edition Prints at: www.furnfeather.net
Personal Web-site at: www.main.furnfeather.net
Stock Photography at: http://tinyurl.com/2amll4
Other related posts:
