[ktap] Re: [PATCH] FFI support for ktap
- From: Jovi Zhangwei <jovi.zhangwei@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: ktap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2013 11:10:41 +0800
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 3:44 AM, Yicheng <qycqycqycqycqyc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> IMHO, the FFI feature should have the same priority as 'insmod' operations.
> Because what FFI API can do is the same as (or subset of) kernel modules, it
> should
> be fine if it is managed as kernel modules.
>
Yeh, it seems we cannot do anything if user want to crash kernel in
intrusive mode,
just like we don't have a good approach to prevent bad kernel modules. :)
Jovi
Other related posts: