[knoxev] Re: Battery pack weight/capacity/range comparison from Munro & Associates

  • From: "Hrivnak, David James" <dhrivnak@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <knoxev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2021 08:41:55 -0400

As Robert said it is all of the above.  And Tesla has been aggressively
working on efficiency for over 13 years now.   Aero tweaks, slightly more
efficient drive train, lightweighting, higher density cells, better
packaging, better sleep modes for computers, LED lighting.  Twenty .5% to 1%
gains will add up to 15% more efficiency.

 

From: knoxev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <knoxev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of
Overly Jonathan G (Redacted sender "jgoverly" for DMARC)
Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2021 7:42 AM
To: knoxev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [knoxev] Re: Battery pack weight/capacity/range comparison from
Munro & Associates

 

Thoughts on what it is that is making the Teslas go so much further based on
weight of batteries? Is it a) battery technology, b) otherwise
light-weighting of the rest of the car, or c) something else?

 

(Plus would be nice to know the 82 kWh battery pack size for Teslas)

 

Peace

Jonathan 

 

East TN Clean Fuels Coalition + Tennessee Clean Fuels

311 Conference Center Building

Knoxville, TN 37996-4134

 

865-974-3625 – office  |  865-803-7555 – cell

 <mailto:jonathan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> jonathan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 

 <http://www.tncleanfuels.org/> www.TNCleanFuels.org

 

From: knoxev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:knoxev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<knoxev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:knoxev-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > On
Behalf Of W.R. German
Sent: Monday, July 5, 2021 6:22 PM
To: knoxev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:knoxev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [knoxev] Battery pack weight/capacity/range comparison from Munro &
Associates

 

 





Mit freundlichen Grüßen/Kind regards,

Robert German
Tesla referral code: Robert85963

Sent from somewhere 

 
<https://t.sidekickopen08.com/s3t/o/5/f18dQhb0S7n28bGmHcW4S7xr62zGCvGW40Fv_6
2SXv86W6W0__48q-mDHF7fJ_ZTlMWHf7Px5Wd03?si=8000000004795331&pi=2aa936c7-d1cf
-4b68-a288-92c2ef87e747> 

JPEG image

Other related posts: