Re: Terminal server

  • From: "John Miller" <n1umj@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 08:26:22 -0500

they can get the remote access authorization if they want but with out jaw 
6.0 it's a waste.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Chandni" <chandni1@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2005 6:22 AM
Subject: RE: Terminal server


> Thanks so much, Matthew!
> I use the dongle version of JAWS5. Is JAWS 6 an absolute requirement? I
> don't think it's included in my updates and I'm not sure the hospital 
> where
> I work is willing to purchase an update so soon. It might be willing to
> purchase the remote access authorization though.
>
> Thanks a billion for taking the time to provide such detailed info!
>
> Fran
>
> --
> To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to 
> jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.
> Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw
>
> If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, or 
> the way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather 
> contact the list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 


--
To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to 
jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.
Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw

If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, or the 
way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather contact the 
list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Other related posts: