Hello Adrian, Curious to see the Reuter's piece, I went to the Beta accessible Google search engine whose link has been sent around today on several of my mailing lists, and input the exact headline in the edit box, first without quotes and then with. Either way, the Reuters article didn't come up on the first page. However, when I went to the regular Google search function and entered the same search terms, the Reuters link came up immediately after a couple of sponsored links on the first results page. Interesting. Or ironic. Perhaps the search engine determined that the Reuters site isn't up to W3C accessibility standards? I read the FAQ page on the Beta search engine site, and some of the criteria used seemed a bit off, to me, unless the wording wasn't as accurate as it might have been. Sites with photos or graphics, especially. Every day, I navigate article pages from the Times to Slate, completely unbothered and unimpeded by the photos that download to the pages. And if I'm feeling like cruising an extremely clean and simplified version of such a page, I click on the Print link and get such a page, of nothing but text. I wonder, fittingly, how rational and realistic some of Google's other criteria for accessibility are. Anyway,thanks for the heads up about the Reuters piece. Do you really think they'd sic their legal department on someone copying and pasting one of their articles, which I assume are offered free of charge, into a group email? I kind of doubt it. but I'm not a lawyer, and I don't even play one on TV. More seriously, there are stories and articles of mine floating around all sorts of blind-related Web sites and some others, pieces originally published in the Los Angeles Times, and with that paper retaining the copyright, as is done these days. A mere Google search on their part could turn up these "reprints" anytime they wanted to find them, but, well, I haven't yet received a warning call from my editor or the Tribune Corp. legal staff in Chicago. Go figure. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Adrian Spratt" <A.Spratt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: <jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <jawslite@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2006 8:06 PM Subject: Google Hi everyone. Tonight Reuters has published a report on Google's initiative to make its website more accessible. I don't want to run afoul of Reuters' copyright, so here's the article's title and author in case anyone is interested enough to search for it. One place you're likely to find it is at Yahoo Finance. Go to the page on Google's stock information. Google's stock symbol is GOOG. I'm sorry to be this obtuse, but I hope I've given enough to make finding it, whether through Yahoo or google's own website, relatively simple. Google tests more accessible Web search for blind By Eric Auchard -- JFW related links: JFW homepage: http://www.freedomscientific.com/ Scripting mailing list: http://lists.the-jdh.com/listinfo.cgi/scriptography-the-jdh.com JFW List instructions: To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line. Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, or the way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather contact the list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.3/394 - Release Date: 7/20/2006 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.3/394 - Release Date: 7/20/2006 -- JFW related links: JFW homepage: http://www.freedomscientific.com/ Scripting mailing list: http://lists.the-jdh.com/listinfo.cgi/scriptography-the-jdh.com JFW List instructions: To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line. Archives located at: //www.freelists.org/archives/jfw If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, or the way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather contact the list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx