RE: [Bulk] Re: FYI

  • From: "Farfar Carlson" <dgcarlson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 15:57:14 -0800

Brandon, that's one of those Marketing decisions that I mentioned earlier - 
most likely due to increasing cost to license it from that aforementioned third 
party. It just got too expensive to provide it with the standard product 
package. Do they not point you to the third party so you can deal direct?
Dave Carlson
Produced on a Nokia N95 using Nuance TALKS screen-reading software.

-original message-
Subject: [Bulk] Re: FYI
From: Brandon Misch <bmisch2002@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: 12-22-2010 15:17

that may have worked for you but didn't for me. i've have been going at them 
for breaking access 32 and no fixes although they told me it's no longer 
supported third party access that is. 

On Dec 22, 2010, at 4:32 PM, Yadiel Sotomayor wrote:

> Actually Tim, you are wrong. Let me explain. I have been complaining for 
> almost a month now to FS to fix a bug in jaws 12. I followed the normal 
> procedure and now people from FS told me that the problem will be addressed 
> on a future update (next one they promised). So you see, keep at it and stop 
> bitching on the list. Bitch to FS.
> Yadiel
> From: Tim
> Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2010 5:27 PM
> To: jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: FYI
> I wouldn't expect them to respond too soon to an email like this. You see 
> Freedom Scientific automatically forwards all of its customer email to a 
> little old man working out of an igloo in the North Pole. Only the positive 
> feedback is sent back to the U.S. The rest of the email is permanently filed 
> away in a folder which will never be opened save to file more email away such 
> as this one.
> Tim
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Brandon Misch
> To: jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2010 3:10 PM
> Subject: Re: FYI
> they hardly get back to you at that address. 
> On Dec 22, 2010, at 12:31 PM, Mark wrote:
>> I have been using Jaws since version 3.
>> Presently, I am leaning towards a Mac because of your SMA policy.
>> Having to eliminate a SMA every year, especially when I run the professional 
>> version is expensive!
>> My wife uses windoweyes. Her SMA is far less expensive.
>> Since you will be putting up a SMA price and the above mentioned, I will 
>> most likely forego any more SMAs after my last 2 are done. My Mac, at that 
>> time, will be a virtual boot system, allowing me window base applications.   
>> Because of your pricing policies, you lost my wife’s business 3 years ago. 
>> Most likely mine also.
>> If you are interested, many people are expressing this manner of thought!
>> I enjoy your product and do not mind expenses, but this camel’s back is 
>> about to break!
>> Seduce my mind and you can have my body. Find my soul and I am yours forever.
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - 
> Version: 9.0.872 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3331 - Release Date: 12/22/10 
> 01:34:00

JFW related links:
JFW homepage:
Scripting mailing list:
JFW List instructions:
To post a message to the list, send it to jfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, send a message to 
jfw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.
Archives located at:
Alternative archives located at:

If you have any concerns about the list, post received from the list, or the 
way the list is being run, do not post them to the list. Rather contact the 
list owner at jfw-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Other related posts: