Quoting Simon Smith <simon_smith@xxxxxxxxx>: > In message <1159172534.451791b652ba6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > davehigton@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > <snip> > > > I have been subscribed to the Linux USB users mailing list for a few > > weeks now, and it has astonished me how many USB devices there are out > > there that do not conform to the USB standards. > > > > Windoze must be contain a huge list of exceptions in order to handle > > these devices without apparent errors. > > No; a more likely explanation Windows simply does not implement the standard > correctly, and is often oblivious to the problems caused by incomplete or > incorrect USB implementations. All USB devices are tested against Windows - > and often against Windows alone. And if they don't work with Windows, but do > follow the standard, they'll be altered to work with Windows in preference > to following the standard. Once the device works without error with Windows, > it's probably going to be considered good to ship. No; there are devices out there that do conform to the USB standards. Those that don't conform, fail to conform in many different ways. I can see no evidence that there is a "one true Windows way". Dave --- To alter your preferences or leave the group, visit //www.freelists.org/list/iyonix-support Other info via //www.freelists.org/webpage/iyonix-support