[isapros] Re: 3rd Party App problem.
- From: "Thor (Hammer of God)" <thor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "isapros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <isapros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2006 10:27:14 -0700
You could still "comply" though. Route relationship between the Internal
and the 3rd leg and only allow the citrix traffic. 'Twer it me though, I'll
still make the 3rd leg private and have an additional NAT device between the
DSL box (unless the one you get meets with your approval) just so that you
don't have to "trust" the other side too much ;)
t
On 7/6/06 10:16 AM, "Steve Moffat" <steve@xxxxxxxxxx> spoketh to all:
> Yeah, that's what I said to them. They have 200 workstations....:)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:isapros-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of Thor (Hammer of God)
> Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2006 2:13 PM
> To: isapros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [isapros] Re: 3rd Party App problem.
>
> Why not just have a static route to the DSL interface off the 3rd nic
> for destinations to the host? That would work. Of course, they'll
> never know if that's the "only traffic" on the circuit ;)
>
> t
>
>
> On 7/6/06 9:57 AM, "Steve Moffat" <steve@xxxxxxxxxx> spoketh to all:
>
>> One of my customers, an insurance agent needs access to an application
>
>> at one of their insurance companies HQ's. The app is on a citrix
> server.
>> Simple you say.....hmm
>>
>> This is what they have been told.
>>
>> They will be supplied with a dedicated DSL link between HQ and my
>> customer.
>>
>> My customer is to add a 3rd nic to his ISA and have it connect to this
>
>> dsl connection. Only the traffic to the insurance app is to go
>> through this DMZ dsl connection.
>>
>> Am I correct in thinking this cannot be done? The WAN provider for the
>
>> big insurance company assures the customer that this can be done.
>>
>> As far as I am aware, the Citrix Server is in a DMZ hanging off a
>> checkpoint Firewall.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Other related posts:
