[isalist] Re: WAFR

  • From: "Ball, Dan" <DBall@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <isalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 15:03:00 -0400

I just noticed that the current revision of the article doesn't contain
the "proxy firewall" phrase anymore...

 

________________________________

From: isalist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:isalist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Jim Harrison
Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2006 9:52 AM
To: isalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [isalist] WAFR

 

http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=18810114
8

 

"Microsoft has a firewall, of sorts, in the Internet Security
Acceleration (ISA) Server, which is more of a proxy
<http://www.channelweb.com/encyclopedia/defineterm.jhtml?term=proxy&x=&y
=>  firewall
<http://www.channelweb.com/encyclopedia/defineterm.jhtml?term=firewall&x
=&y=>  than the heavy stateful-inspection kind marketed by Check Point,
Cisco and Juniper."

 

I guess research isn't required any more...

All mail to and from this domain is GFI-scanned.

Other related posts: