I can see your point... I guess it is a step forward against fighting bad implementations of good ideas (i.e. RBL¹s) even if not on firm footing. t On 9/15/06 9:03 AM, "Thomas W Shinder" <tshinder@xxxxxxxxxxx> spoketh to all: > Boo, for the waste of money, but yay for someone (even if they are bad guys) > willing to fight these do-gooders. IMHO, RBLs create more damage than they > prevent. But, this is a topic on which reasonable men can disagree. ;) > > Thomas W Shinder, M.D. > Site: www.isaserver.org <http://www.isaserver.org/> > Blog: http://blogs.isaserver.org/shinder/ > Book: http://tinyurl.com/3xqb7 <http://tinyurl.com/3xqb7> > MVP -- ISA Firewalls > > > >> >> >> >> From: isalist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:isalist-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On >> Behalf Of Thor (Hammer of God) >> Sent: Friday, September 15, 2006 10:55 AM >> To: isalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: [isalist] Re: Spam fighter hit with $11.7 million judgment | Tech >> News on ZDNet >> >> >> I don¹t know if I¹d say ³yah² considering how much of our tax money must >> have been wasted by having a US district court find against a UK company. >> What a colossal waste of time. >> >> t >> >> >> On 9/15/06 8:42 AM, "Thomas W Shinder" <tshinder@xxxxxxxxxxx> spoketh to >> all: >> >> >>> Yay! Now if we can get judgements against all the good for nothing do >>> gooders... >>> >>> Spam fighter hit with $11.7 million judgment | Tech News on ZDNet: >>> http://news.zdnet.com/2100-1009_22-6116009.html?part=rss&tag=feed&subj=zdnet >>> <http://news.zdnet.com/2100-1009_22-6116009.html?part=rss&tag=feed&s >>> ubj=zdnet> >>> <http://news.zdnet.com/2100-1009_22-6116009.html?part=rss&tag=feed&s >>> ubj=zdnet> >>> >> >