RR DNS is a poor failover / load balancing technique. It depends on: 1. the DNS server to provide a list of valid IPs; the DNS server is rarely even aware of the resources that the IPs represent. 2. the DNS client to determine when a resource is unavailable and to choose the next address; the client is also rarely aware of the resource state. RR DNS does provide a minimum measure of load-sharing for the servers, but only if they're all online. Jim Harrison MCP(NT4, W2K), A+, Network+, PCG http://isaserver.org/pages/author_index.asp?aut=3 http://isatools.org Read the books! ----- Original Message ----- From: "Greg Wright" <greg@xxxxxxxxxxxx> To: "[ISAserver.org Discussion List]" <isalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 12:25 AM Subject: [isalist] Load Balancing the Proxy via Round Robin DNS http://www.ISAserver.org Hi everyone, Anyone played around with Round Robin DNS configurations for load balancing? Specifically, what sort of issue's (if any) exist when one of the servers is offline? Cheers, Greg ------------------------------------------------------ List Archives: http://www.webelists.com/cgi/lyris.pl?enter=isalist ISA Server Newsletter: http://www.isaserver.org/pages/newsletter.asp ISA Server FAQ: http://www.isaserver.org/pages/larticle.asp?type=FAQ ------------------------------------------------------ Exchange Server Resource Site: http://www.msexchange.org/ Windows Security Resource Site: http://www.windowsecurity.com/ Windows 2000/NT Fax Solutions: http://www.ntfaxfaq.com ------------------------------------------------------ You are currently subscribed to this ISAserver.org Discussion List as: jim@xxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send a blank email to $subst('Email.Unsub')