RE: ISA Standard 2004 SP1 Vs Win Ent2003 SP1

  • From: "Ara" <ara@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "[ISAserver.org Discussion List]" <isalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 22:01:24 -0700

Tom,
I have made a slipstreamed cd of windows with service pack 1. Will put a
server up tomorrow and then install isa and then service pack for isa.
Is that going to cause problems since it is opposite of your suggested
method?

-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas W Shinder [mailto:tshinder@xxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 6:34 AM
To: [ISAserver.org Discussion List]
Subject: [isalist] RE: ISA Standard 2004 SP1 Vs Win Ent2003 SP1

http://www.ISAserver.org

Hi Prasad,

Install ISA SP1 first, then Windows Server 2003 SP1 after that.

HTH, 


Tom
www.isaserver.org/shinder
Tom and Deb Shinder's Configuring ISA Server 2004
http://tinyurl.com/3xqb7
MVP -- ISA Firewalls


-----Original Message-----
From: Prasad [mailto:kprasadbabu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 8:22 AM
To: [ISAserver.org Discussion List]
Subject: [isalist] ISA Standard 2004 SP1 Vs Win Ent2003 SP1

http://www.ISAserver.org

Hi All,
Presently I am running ISA standard 2004 on windows enterprise 2003 OS. 
Recently Microsoft has replease SP1 for both Win Ent2003 and ISA Std
2004.
Please do let me know which SP1 (either OS or ISA) needs to be applied
first
and which one later. Please let me know the order of installation of
SP1's.
Are there any known issues of isa std2004 sp1 running on win ent2003
sp1?
-- 
Thanks & Regards,
Prasad.

------------------------------------------------------
List Archives: http://www.webelists.com/cgi/lyris.pl?enter=isalist
ISA Server Newsletter: http://www.isaserver.org/pages/newsletter.asp
ISA Server FAQ: http://www.isaserver.org/pages/larticle.asp?type=FAQ
------------------------------------------------------
Other Internet Software Marketing Sites:
World of Windows Networking: http://www.windowsnetworking.com
Leading Network Software Directory: http://www.serverfiles.com
No.1 Exchange Server Resource Site: http://www.msexchange.org
Windows Security Resource Site: http://www.windowsecurity.com/
Network Security Library: http://www.secinf.net/
Windows 2000/NT Fax Solutions: http://www.ntfaxfaq.com
------------------------------------------------------
You are currently subscribed to this ISAserver.org Discussion List as:
tshinder@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe visit http://www.webelists.com/cgi/lyris.pl?enter=isalist
Report abuse to listadmin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx



------------------------------------------------------
List Archives: http://www.webelists.com/cgi/lyris.pl?enter=isalist
ISA Server Newsletter: http://www.isaserver.org/pages/newsletter.asp
ISA Server FAQ: http://www.isaserver.org/pages/larticle.asp?type=FAQ
------------------------------------------------------
Other Internet Software Marketing Sites:
World of Windows Networking: http://www.windowsnetworking.com
Leading Network Software Directory: http://www.serverfiles.com
No.1 Exchange Server Resource Site: http://www.msexchange.org
Windows Security Resource Site: http://www.windowsecurity.com/
Network Security Library: http://www.secinf.net/
Windows 2000/NT Fax Solutions: http://www.ntfaxfaq.com
------------------------------------------------------
You are currently subscribed to this ISAserver.org Discussion List as:
ara@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe visit http://www.webelists.com/cgi/lyris.pl?enter=isalist
Report abuse to listadmin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Attention:
This message, including any attachment(s), is intended only for the use of the 
individual(s) to which it is addressed and may contain information that is 
privileged or confidential.  Any other distribution, copying or disclosure is 
strictly prohibited.  If you are not the intended recipient or have received 
this message in error, please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and 
permanently delete this message including any attachment(s), without reading it 
or making a copy.
Any outgoing message has been scanned for possible harmful file(s) or 
script(s), but it is your sole responsibility to run detection tools as we 
won't guarantee the safety of message(s).




Other related posts: