RE: ISA Caching
- From: "Jim Harrison" <Jim@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "[ISAserver.org Discussion List]" <isalist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2006 21:37:08 -0800
You can determine direction by the rule or URL that's quoted.
Since I seriously doubt that you can publish isaserver.org, it's a fair
bet that this is "externals".
________________________________
From: Ball, Dan [mailto:DBall@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 6:18 PM
To: [ISAserver.org Discussion List]
Subject: [isalist] RE: ISA Caching
http://www.ISAserver.org
You know, that's a good question... When it says "returned from
Internet", is it including published websites on an "internal" network,
or just from the "external" network?
A little over half of our internal clients are using direct access for
our website, so they theoretically shouldn't show up on this list. The
other half, however, are using the published webserver for access, so
they "might" show up in this list depending on how the "returned from
the Internet" is determined. In either case, our local cache is more
than big enough to store that particular website.
That's good to know that 34% is a good percentage, I got asked that
recently and I wasn't sure.
________________________________
From: Thomas W Shinder [mailto:tshinder@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 3:29 PM
To: [ISAserver.org Discussion List]
Subject: [isalist] RE: ISA Caching
http://www.ISAserver.org
Hi Dan,
That's darned good if you ask me!
However, is the bulk of your traffic Web publishing or outbound access?
Ideally, all the content in your published Web sites should fit in
cache.
Tom
Thomas W Shinder, M.D.
Site: www.isaserver.org <http://www.isaserver.org/>
Blog: http://blogs.isaserver.org/shinder/
Book: http://tinyurl.com/3xqb7
MVP -- ISA Firewalls
________________________________
From: Ball, Dan [mailto:DBall@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 2:19 PM
To: [ISAserver.org Discussion List]
Subject: [isalist] RE: ISA Caching
http://www.ISAserver.org
Yes, from the daily reports:
Status
Requests
% of Total Requests
Total Bytes
Objects returned from the Internet
589838
64.40 %
6.53 GB
Objects returned from cache without verification
280965
30.70 %
1.22 GB
Objects returned from cache after verifying that they have not changed
31222
3.40 %
220.89 MB
Objects returned from the Internet, updating a file in cache
4312
0.50 %
30.49 MB
Information not available
9120
1.00 %
21.73 MB
Total
915457
100.00 %
8.01 GB
________________________________
From: Thomas W Shinder [mailto:tshinder@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 3:07 PM
To: [ISAserver.org Discussion List]
Subject: [isalist] RE: ISA Caching
http://www.ISAserver.org
Hi Dan,
Specify what you mean by "cached traffic"
Do you mean traffic returned from cache?
If so, that's really good!
Tom
Thomas W Shinder, M.D.
Site: www.isaserver.org <http://www.isaserver.org/>
Blog: http://blogs.isaserver.org/shinder/
Book: http://tinyurl.com/3xqb7
MVP -- ISA Firewalls
________________________________
From: Ball, Dan [mailto:DBall@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 2:04 PM
To: [ISAserver.org Discussion List]
Subject: [isalist] ISA Caching
http://www.ISAserver.org
What is a good percentage of cached traffic with
ISA2004?
Currently we're getting about 34% traffic cached, is
this a typical percentage?
------------------------------------------------------
List Archives: http://www.webelists.com/cgi/lyris.pl?enter=isalist
ISA Server Newsletter: http://www.isaserver.org/pages/newsletter.asp
ISA Server FAQ: http://www.isaserver.org/pages/larticle.asp?type=FAQ
------------------------------------------------------
Visit TechGenix.com for more information about our other sites:
http://www.techgenix.com
------------------------------------------------------
You are currently subscribed to this ISAserver.org Discussion List as:
jim@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe visit http://www.webelists.com/cgi/lyris.pl?enter=isalist
Report abuse to listadmin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
All mail to and from this domain is GFI-scanned.
Other related posts:
