On 25-Nov-07, at 2:40 PM, Praveen A wrote:
My gut says t go with the GPL -- I mean, trust people not
to use
a logo which says "Fossconf chennai feb 2008" to refer to something
else, really. Or allow modification, but ask for a name change
(don't
refer to fossconf in the derived work).
In lots of situations, less control works out OK. On the
other
hand, if you treat people like criminals, they tend to behave like
that.
I would also like to see the logo under GPL.
Is there any credible harm that a restrictive license is
shielding us from?
Exactly what are we going to gain by this restriction? Preventing some
other foss conference using it?