On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 06:23:18 +0530, Kenneth Gonsalves
<lawgon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> said:
On 24-Nov-07, at 9:55 PM, Praveen A wrote:
If we don't practice what we preach, then what is the point, we would
be like Canaonical people (well, foss is good and everything but we
are spending money developing launchpad, no? and foss is just for
stuff _you_ get it for free not what you develop). They have all the
legal right to do so but then what makes them different from
Microsoft? (well atleast Microsoft does not claim they are a foss
company). I think it is on topic because similar actions by other
members of the community didn't go well with the community.
what exactly are you trying to say here? Is it your thesis that any
company that promotes, develops or distributes opensource/free
software should not at the same time use, develop or distribute closed
source software?