[PCB_FORUM] Re: Teardrop Shapes

  • From: TEYSSIER Jean-Charles <jcteyssier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <icu-pcb-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 06:08:50 +0100 (CET)

Hi Chris,



I suppose it is advantageous in case of verry close vias : in some case «
standard » teardrop can not be generated and can be generated in curved
mode.

Or maybe other reason unwon of me.



Jean-Charles TEYSSIER
Responsable d’affaire
Adeneo

Adetel Group
4, chemin du Ruisseau
69134 ECULLY - FRANCE
Tél:+33 (0)4 26 49 04 09-Fax:+33 (0)4 72 86 05 39
 <http://www.adetelgroup.com/> www.adetelgroup.com

P Before printing, think about ENVIRONMENTAL responsibility!



  _____

De : icu-pcb-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:icu-pcb-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] De la part de Shaw,
Christopher
Envoyé : lundi 17 novembre 2014 16:24
À : icu-pcb-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Objet : [PCB_FORUM] Teardrop Shapes



Hi,

I’d like to find out more about the pros and cons of different teardrop
(tapered trace) shapes – long taper vs short taper, straight edge vs
curved edge. Why was the curved edge introduced, and under what
circumstances is it advantageous?  Are there any good books or websites on
the subject?

Thanks,



Chris Shaw

Senior Design Automation Analyst

Fujitsu Network Communications Inc.

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. icu-pcb-forum
  3. Archive
  4. 11-2014