[ibis-quality] Re: Minutes from the 10 Apr 2007 ibis-quality meeting
- From: "Tom Dagostino" <tom@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <ibis-quality@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 14:34:59 -0700
I noticed the discussion about terminator models for analog functions on
ICs. We do this routinely for several reasons:
It allows the simulator to include the analog nets in crosstalk simulations.
The user gets a first order look at induced noise in analog nets.
Customers have requested this "feature".
For NC pins we will include terminator models so that users can run traces
through these pads and pick up the associated pin parasitics in the
simulations. Yes, some companies actually recommend running traces through
no connect pins for their ICs.
Tom Dagostino
Teraspeed(R) Labs
13610 SW Harness Lane
Beaverton, OR 97008
503-430-1065
tom@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
www.teraspeed.com
Teraspeed Consulting Group LLC
121 North River Drive
Narragansett, RI 02882
401-284-1827
-----Original Message-----
From: ibis-quality-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:ibis-quality-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mike LaBonte
(milabont)
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 1:50 PM
To: ibis-quality@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ibis-quality] Minutes from the 10 Apr 2007 ibis-quality meeting
Minutes from the 10 Apr 2007 ibis-quality meeting are attached.
ARs:
AR: Kim write new language adding 3.1.4 recommendations to 3.1.2
AR: Mike update spec with Kim's input, remove 3.1.4
AR: Mike update 3.2.1 to be less prescriptive for analog pins.
Mike
---------------------------------------------------------------------
IBIS Quality website: http://www.eda.org/pub/ibis/quality_wip/
IBIS Quality archives: //www.freelists.org/archives/ibis-quality
To unsubscribe send an email:
To: ibis-quality-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: unsubscribe
Other related posts:
