Minutes for ibis-quality meetings from April 28 through May 12 are attached. Mike
Minutes, IBIS Quality Committee 12 May 2009 11-12 AM EST (8-9 AM PST) ROLL CALL Adam Tambone * Anders Ekholm, Ericsson Barry Katz, SiSoft Benny Lazer Benjamin P Silva Bob Cox, Micron * Bob Ross, Teraspeed Consulting Group Brian Arsenault David Banas, Xilinx Eckhard Lenski, Nokia Siemens Networks Eric Brock * Guan Tao, Huawei Technologies Gregory R Edlund Hazem Hegazy Huang Chunxing, Huawei Technologies John Figueroa John Angulo, Mentor Graphics Katja Koller, Nokia Siemens Networks Kevin Fisher Kim Helliwell, LSI Logic Lance Wang, IOMethodology Lynne Green * Mike LaBonte, Cisco Systems Mike Mayer, SiSoft * Moshiul Haque, Micron Technology Muniswarareddy Vorugu, ARM Ltd * Pavani Jella, TI Peter LaFlamme Randy Wolff, Micron Technology Radovan Vuletic, Qimonda Robert Haller, Enterasys Roy Leventhal, Leventhal Design & Communications Sherif Hammad, Mentor Graphics Todd Westerhoff, SiSoft Tom Dagostino, Teraspeed Consulting Group Kazuyoshi Shoji, Hitachi Sadahiro Nonoyama Liqun, Huawei Everyone in attendance marked by * NOTE: "AR" = Action Required. -----------------------MINUTES --------------------------- Mike LaBonte conducted the meeting. Call for patent disclosure: - No one declared a patent. AR Review: - Mike look into MeetingPlace issues - This is a WebEx meeting now - Some had difficulties getting in: - Web sharing crashed the first time for Anders - Bob had to click Attend Meeting, did not see it at first - Mike: There should be a URL to go straight to Attend New items: Continued review of the IQ 1.1 specification: 5.5.3. {LEVEL 2} [Ramp] dV consistent with supply voltages - Mike: Not sure if we decided last time to delete 5.5.3 - Anders: We discussed this 2 meetings ago - 5.5.3 is much easier to check than 5.5.4 - Mike: But both are needed to achieve level 2 - Mike: We will eventually drop 5.5.4 when IBISCHK implements it - Anders: Are we requiring software to perform these checks? - Mike: We could drop 5.5.4 from IQ now and immediately file a bug report - Bob: We could note that a more rigorous check will appear in IBISCHK - Vote: Should we drop 5.5.3 and keep 5.5.4? - Anders: yes - Bob: yes - Guan: yes - Mike: yes - Pavani: yes - We voted to remove the 5.5.3 check 5.5.4. {LEVEL 2} [Ramp] dV consistent with V-T table endpoints - We change the title of this and completely replaced the contents: 5.5.4. {LEVEL 2} [Ramp] dV consistent with I-V table calculations - Bob: We can explain the workaround method to have IBISCHK calculate V - Anders: What will IBISCHK say about the temporary waveforms? - Will it find other issues? - Bob: No, IBISCHK doesn't make that many checks - Mike: The two temporary waveform points could both be -1V - Bob: Only one point has to be wrong to make IBISCHK print voltages - Bob: Unfortunately the values are printed with only 2 decimal digits - There are techniques to find the real value We added a third paragraph to 5.5.4: - We immediately removed it because the 2nd paragraph covers that 5.5.5. {LEVEL 2} [Ramp] dt is consistent with 20%-80% crossing time - We added a 2nd paragraph to explain waveform selection criteria - Bob: It only applies if the right waveform is present - We should call for an alternative dt reference if none - We added a sentence for this After deleting 5.5.3, 5.5.4 and 5.5.5 became 5.5.3 and 5.5.4 Next meeting: 19 May 2009 11-12 AM EST (8-9 AM PST) Meeting ended at 12:04 PM Eastern Time.
Minutes, IBIS Quality Committee 28 Apr 2009 11-12 AM EST (8-9 AM PST) ROLL CALL Adam Tambone * Anders Ekholm, Ericsson Barry Katz, SiSoft Benny Lazer Benjamin P Silva Bob Cox, Micron * Bob Ross, Teraspeed Consulting Group Brian Arsenault David Banas, Xilinx Eckhard Lenski, Nokia Siemens Networks Eric Brock * Guan Tao, Huawei Technologies Gregory R Edlund Hazem Hegazy Huang Chunxing, Huawei Technologies John Figueroa John Angulo, Mentor Graphics Katja Koller, Nokia Siemens Networks Kevin Fisher Kim Helliwell, LSI Logic Lance Wang, IOMethodology Lynne Green * Mike LaBonte, Cisco Systems Mike Mayer, SiSoft * Moshiul Haque, Micron Technology Muniswarareddy Vorugu, ARM Ltd Pavani Jella, TI Peter LaFlamme Randy Wolff, Micron Technology Radovan Vuletic, Qimonda Robert Haller, Enterasys Roy Leventhal, Leventhal Design & Communications Sherif Hammad, Mentor Graphics Todd Westerhoff, SiSoft Tom Dagostino, Teraspeed Consulting Group Kazuyoshi Shoji, Hitachi Sadahiro Nonoyama Liqun, Huawei Everyone in attendance marked by * NOTE: "AR" = Action Required. -----------------------MINUTES --------------------------- Mike LaBonte conducted the meeting. Call for patent disclosure: - No one declared a patent. AR Review: - Mike look into MeetingPlace issues - Mike will use WebEx for our next meeting - MeetingPlace will be the backup New items: Should we file an IBISCHK bug report for a dV against I/V check? - We decided not to do this immediately [Ramp] dV checks: - Mike: Possible checks are: - dV against supply voltage - dV against V/T endpoints - dV against I/V - We voted unanimously to replace 5.5.4 with a dV vs. I/V - Moshiul: Which of these is the central reference? - When discrepancies are found, either could be wrong - Anders: The old 5.5.4 checked against I-V - Bob: We can synthesize V/T tables based on Ramp to do this in IBISCHK - The idea is to create fake waveforms with [Ramp] fixtures - Just one bogus point is needed - This forces IBISCHK to print the correct voltage calculated from I/V - How much accuracy to require: - Anders: This should be much more accurate than V/T endpoint checks - Bob: Taking 60% of a value reduces the error magnitude - Mike: Taking a difference doubles the error magnitude - I/V interpolation will add error too - Bob: The error limit should be 10% - Mike: How about 1% ? - Bob: Tables may not have enough significant digits - Anders: How about 5% - Mike: We should set an accuracy criteria based on simulation results - But dV is not used for anything - An error of 10mV for a 2.5V part would be 4% - Anders: This will show if someone has tweaked [Voltage Range] - Mike: This check can detect poor I/V resolution - Bob: There can be DC convergence issues - Mike: And I/V test fixtures are difficult to simulate - The values calculated from I-V will be the reference for error percentage Next meeting: 05 May 2009 11-12 AM EST (8-9 AM PST) Meeting ended at 12:08 PM Eastern Time.
Minutes, IBIS Quality Committee 05 May 2009 11-12 AM EST (8-9 AM PST) ROLL CALL Adam Tambone Anders Ekholm, Ericsson Barry Katz, SiSoft Benny Lazer Benjamin P Silva Bob Cox, Micron * Bob Ross, Teraspeed Consulting Group Brian Arsenault David Banas, Xilinx Eckhard Lenski, Nokia Siemens Networks Eric Brock Guan Tao, Huawei Technologies Gregory R Edlund Hazem Hegazy Huang Chunxing, Huawei Technologies John Figueroa John Angulo, Mentor Graphics Katja Koller, Nokia Siemens Networks Kevin Fisher Kim Helliwell, LSI Logic Lance Wang, IOMethodology Lynne Green * Mike LaBonte, Cisco Systems Mike Mayer, SiSoft Moshiul Haque, Micron Technology Muniswarareddy Vorugu, ARM Ltd * Pavani Jella, TI Peter LaFlamme Randy Wolff, Micron Technology Radovan Vuletic, Qimonda Robert Haller, Enterasys Roy Leventhal, Leventhal Design & Communications Sherif Hammad, Mentor Graphics Todd Westerhoff, SiSoft Tom Dagostino, Teraspeed Consulting Group Kazuyoshi Shoji, Hitachi Sadahiro Nonoyama Liqun, Huawei Everyone in attendance marked by * NOTE: "AR" = Action Required. -----------------------MINUTES --------------------------- Mike LaBonte conducted the meeting. Call for patent disclosure: - No one declared a patent. AR Review: - Mike look into MeetingPlace issues - There was confusion over how to control the meeting invitation with WebEx - Mike will set up an external test meeting New items: Continued review of the IQ 1.1 specification: 5.5.3. {LEVEL 2} [Ramp] dV consistent with supply voltages - Mike changed the text to: The [Ramp] dV values must not exceed 60% (80% - 20%) of the supply voltage range for non-ECL output buffer technologies. The supply voltage range is either [Pullup Reference] - [Pulldown Reference], or [Voltage Range], if present. This check is not applicable to current mode technologies such as ECL, where pulldown operation is not referenced to a voltage given by [Pulldown Reference] or to a 0V ground. - Bob: This check should be deleted. - It is a sanity check only - 5.5.4 is an overlay check and that is better - Mike: Also, the description of supply voltage to use is not clear - For example, ECL does not pull down to 0V - Bob: the limit could be calculated using -2V for ECL - Both 5.5.3 and 5.5.4 are required for IQ 2 5.5.4. {LEVEL 2} [Ramp] dV consistent with I-V table calculations - Bob: IBISCHK should check this - We could explain the work-around to check this until IBISCHK has it - Mike: The explanation text that we need was deleted when we replaced 5.5.4 with an entirely new check. - Mike: This references 5.5.7, which no longer exists. - The relevant text from that old check should be inserted here. 5.5.5. {LEVEL 2} [Ramp] dt is consistent with 20%-80% crossing time - Mike: Manual checking of this requires several steps: - Find the right waveforms - Determine endpoint voltages - Set horizontal markers at 20% and 80% points - Set vertical markers at the crossing points and measure dt - Pavani: It's a lot of work to calculate this for every model. - Mike: It should only be necessary to verify that the waveforms used to generate [Ramp] look right - If the software calculates dV and dt correctly once, this should be repeatable - Bob: Some technologies do not produce useful dt with Ramp fixtures. - Should be able to check off this test if dt matches any relevant reference - We can work on 5.5.5 next meeting to incorporate this idea Mike: The DAC IBIS summit is July 28 - Hopefully we will have IQ 1.1 released, and make a summit presentation Next meeting: 12 May 2009 11-12 AM EST (8-9 AM PST) Meeting ended at 12:13PM Eastern Time.