[ibis-macro] Re: Send aggressors into GetWave, as well?

  • From: <fangyi_rao@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <DBanas@xxxxxxxxxx>, <ibis-macro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 8 May 2012 11:09:27 -0600

David;

The reason of separate impulses between victim and aggressor in AMI_Init relies 
on the approach to approximate Rx with a linear model. Take a Rx that has DFE, 
you definitely don't want to apply DFE taps on the aggressor impulses.

In terms of separating main and aggressor waveforms into AMI_GetWave, I don't 
agree with you and Arpad. AMI_GetWave models the physical operation of the Rx 
in real time. A physical Rx receives only one input waveform, which is the 
combination of main and aggressor signals.

Regards,
Fangyi

From: ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
On Behalf Of David Banas
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2012 9:18 AM
To: 'ibis-macro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'
Subject: [ibis-macro] Send aggressors into GetWave, as well?

Hi experts,

In the case where we've included aggressors in our call to `AMI_Init', should 
we also send aggressor waveforms into `AMI_GetWave'?

Thanks,

David Banas
Sr. Member Technical Staff
Altera<http://www.altera.com/>
+1-408-544-7667 - desk

Did you know Altera offers over 150 free online technical training 
courses<http://www.altera.com/servlets/searchcourse?coursetype=Online&WT.mc_id=t9_ot_mi_mi_tx_a_311>?
 Take one today!


________________________________
Confidentiality Notice.
This message may contain information that is confidential or otherwise 
protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that any use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, or 
copying of this message, or any attachments, is strictly prohibited. If you 
have received this message in error, please advise the sender by reply e-mail, 
and delete the message and any attachments. Thank you.

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. ibis-macro
  3. Archive
  4. 05-2012