Thanks, that's what we concluded in the last ATM meeting too...
Arpad
==================================================
From: Fangyi Rao [mailto:fangyi_rao@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2019 11:30 PM
To: Muranyi, Arpad <Arpad_Muranyi@xxxxxxxxxx>; IBIS-ATM
<ibis-macro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: New draft of BIRD197
Hi Arpad,
Your understanding is correct. The input waveform to the Rx GetWave function
does NOT need to be centered on the X-axis.
Regards,
Fangyi
From: ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> On
Behalf Of Muranyi, Arpad
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2019 11:31 AM
To: IBIS-ATM <ibis-macro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:ibis-macro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: [ibis-macro] Re: New draft of BIRD197
[EXTERNAL]
Fangyi,
I discovered a spelling error:
"signle"
should probably be "signal".
I also have a technical question about the following sentence:
"It is assumed that the waveform input to the Rx AMI_GetWave function is the
physical Rx input waveform minus this DC_Offset."
The value for DC_Offset is determined by the EDA tool, for example, from the
channel step response. This is done before the Tx GetWave is executed. At
this time the EDA too doesn't know whether the Tx GetWave function adds
any of its own DC_Offset to the waveform. If it does, the output of Tx GetWave
minus DC_Offset will not be centered on the X-axis. I just want to be sure that
the above sentence does not get interpreted as the input waveform to the Rx
GetWave function is centered on the X-axis. Is my understanding correct?
Thanks,
Arpad
================================================================
From: ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[mailto:ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Fangyi Rao
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2019 6:23 PM
To: IBIS-ATM <ibis-macro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:ibis-macro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: [ibis-macro] New draft of BIRD197
Hi All,
Please find in the attachment the new draft of BIRD197 revised based on
discussion at last week's ATM.
Regards,
Fangyi
