[ibis-macro] Re: IBIS package modeling discussions
- From: Lance Wang <lwang@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "Arpad_Muranyi@xxxxxxxxxx" <Arpad_Muranyi@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 13:04:43 -0400
Arpad,
I would suggest to send this email to whole ibis reflector even SI list. I
guess a lot of people would be interested.
Regards.
Lance Wang
978-764-2298
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 16, 2012, at 12:12 PM, "Muranyi, Arpad" <Arpad_Muranyi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I would like to let everyone know that we are going to
> discuss the IC vendor’s perspective on IBIS package
> modeling in the ATM teleconference tomorrow, and I would
> like to encourage the IBIS representatives of IC and/or
> package vendors to attend the meeting so that we could
> have a productive discussion.
>
> Mike Mirmak will give us an overview of Intel’s package
> modeling practices and hopefully give us some thoughts on
> which direction IBIS should take in order to be useful for
> Intel’s modeling needs.
>
> I would like to have other IC and/or package vendors to
> be present so that they can also express their views
> on the topic, because I don’t want to end up with a
> specification that is tailored to one company’s needs
> only.
>
> Questions I would like to find answer to are along the lines
> of why the current IBIS package modeling is not useful for
> the industry and what should the IBIS specification be
> improved to make it useful again.
>
> We know that the RLC or ideal T-line currently available in
> IBIS is way too inadequate for GHz designs. We would like
> to utilize the IBIS-ISS capabilities to improve on that.
> But do we have problems with the current syntax in the way
> package models are referenced and instantiated in the .ibs
> file? Do we need a different way of doing that? If so how?
> Etc…
>
> I think these meetings are important historic moments in IBIS.
> We have the rare opportunity to define new directions, which
> doesn’t happen very frequently.
>
> I would like to encourage everyone to participate in these
> discussions so that we can find a useful solution for the
> needs of the industry and make IBIS useful for package
> modeling also.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Arpad
> ===============================================================
Other related posts:
