[ibis-macro] Re: [IBIS] BIRD107: Update to Algorithmic Modeling API (AMI) Support in IBIS

  • From: "Muranyi, Arpad" <Arpad_Muranyi@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <ibis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "IBIS-ATM" <ibis-macro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 17:26:16 -0700

Excuse me, but how did the language on pg. 18 of this presentation:
change from:

| If the Reserved Parameter, Use_Init_Output, is set to "False", EDA
tools will
| use the original (unfiltered) impulse response of the channel.
| The algorithmic model is expected to modify the waveform in place.

into what is in the text of the BIRD107:

| If Use_Init_Output is set to "False", the EDA platform will present
| input waveform directly to the AMI_Getwave call (i.e. without
| the waveform with the impulse response returned by AMI_Init).

The two paragraphs have a significant difference and I didn't see
any discussion on that change...  Could someone please explain that
to me?  What happened with the "impulse response of the channel"?



-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ibis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-ibis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Mirmak, Michael
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 5:09 PM
To: ibis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [IBIS] BIRD107: Update to Algorithmic Modeling API (AMI)
Support in IBIS

The enclosed BIRD, "Update to Algorithmic Modeling API (AMI) Support in
IBIS," is submitted on behalf of Todd Westerhoff, SiSoft and Zhen Mu,
Cadence Design Systems.  It will be introduced and discussed at an
upcoming IBIS Open Forum teleconference.

All resolved and pending BIRDs can be found at http:// <<bird107.txt>>

- Michael Mirmak
  Intel Corp.
  Chair, IBIS Open Forum


This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

IBIS Macro website  :  http://www.eda.org/pub/ibis/macromodel_wip/
IBIS Macro reflector:  //www.freelists.org/list/ibis-macro
To unsubscribe send an email:
  To: ibis-macro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  Subject: unsubscribe

Other related posts: