Not sure how I missed this before:
Other Notes: A BCI_Protocol may be private or approved by the IBIS Open
Forum. Protocol names beginning with the prefix "IBIS are reserved for
protocol approved by the IBIS Open Forum.
A second double-quote is missing, and “protocol” needs to be plural.
Mike
From: ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Bob Ross
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2016 8:53 PM
To: 'IBIS-ATM'
Subject: [ibis-macro] Draft1 BIRD147.3 - RE: Re: Draft 7 BIRD147.2
All,
Thank you. BIRD147.2 is officially uploaded on the IBIS Open Forum
site, so here is BIRD147.3 draft1 with Radek’s changes.
This could be proposed as an official update for BIRD147.2.
Bob
From: ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Curtis Clark
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2016 5:47 PM
To: Radek Biernacki (radek_biernacki@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Cc: Bob Ross; IBIS-ATM
Subject: [ibis-macro] Re: Draft 7 BIRD147.2
I like Radek's proposed phrasing.
Curtis
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 8:35 PM, <radek_biernacki@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I would suggest the following phrases:
1. A BCI_Protocol may be private or approved by the IBIS Open Forum.
2. BCI_Protocol names beginning with the prefix “IBIS” are reserved
for protocols approved by the IBIS Open Forum.
Radek
From: ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Curtis Clark
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2016 5:27 PM
To: Bob Ross <bob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: IBIS-ATM <ibis-macro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [ibis-macro] Re: Draft 7 BIRD147.2
Hi All,
Sorry to have to revisit this discussion, but I have some questions about
the new language. I believe Bob properly captured what was discussed in the
meeting, but I think it's still confusing.
We have one sentence:
"A BCI_Protocol may be private, published, or approved by the IBIS Open
Forum."
What is the difference between published and "approved by the IBIS Open
Forum."? If there is no difference, then should we remove published or
combine it with approved?
If there is a difference, and protocols can be published (basically just
made public?) by something other than the IBIS Open Forum, then I think the
following sentence needs to be revised.
"BCI_Protocol names beginning with “IBIS” are reserved for future
protocols adopted and published."
Protocol names beginning with "IBIS" would be for protocols approved by the
IBIS Open Forum, right? Not just "published"?
Perhaps the use of "approved" in one sentence and "adopted" in the other is
also part of the issue?
Thanks,
Curtis
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 4:28 PM, Bob Ross <bob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
All
Changes in the BCI_Protocol User Notes and Example per my interpretation of
our discussion.
Bob
--
Bob Ross
Teraspeed Labs
http://www.teraspeedlabs.com
bob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Direct: 503-246-8048
Office: 971-279-5325
