Walter: From a strict reading of the definition, you could draw the conclusion that a particular Xij parameter over a frequency range defines an input/output relationship, and therefore could be designated as a "transfer function." However, I am still not comfortable with "transfer function" in the context of N-port parameter descriptions for many reasons. 1. Common practice - I have not seen anyone else refer to the N-port parameter Xij terms as "transfer functions," either at a single frequency or as the collection of terms for that particular Xij entry. We should stick with commonly used terminology. 2. Single function - While the definition could be expanded to a matrix input/output relationship, the language implies a single output produced by a single input and seems to imply the functional mathematical relationship. The Xij entry at one frequency is the transfer function of j to i at that frequency only when the other inputs of the matrix - all other ports are terminated. From the matrix perpective, the output is a function of multiple inputs. Also the functional relationship might imply a collection of such Xij(f) for each frequency individually or for the whole set of frequencies for the Xij term. 3. Transfer Function - this seems as a mathematical expression (referred to as complex exponentials) as opposed to the specific data entries or quanties on a per-frequency basis in the definition. I read that to mean a mathematical function relatinship as opposed to a collection of terms. 4. Filter design practice - I recall a distinction in (driving point) impedance/admittances for the same terminal versus a transfer function gain/(trans)impedance/(trans) admittance for different physical terminals. That is the terminology conflict in a related field. ------ Anyway, I think finding terms that are used in common practice for S-parameters and N-port parameters entries and distinguishing whether we are describing a specific entry at one frequency or a set of Xij entries for all frequencies is better practice. Bob Walter Katz wrote:
All,See http://cnx.org/content/m0028/latest/ for better graphics.Is not the Touchstone file exactly this?The ratio of the output and input amplitudes for Figure 1 <http://cnx.org/content/m0028/latest/#rc#rc>, known as the transfer function or the frequency response, is given byVout Vin = H( f)= 1 ⅈ2πfRC +1 (1)Implicit in using the transfer function is that the input is a complex exponential, and the output is also a complex exponential having the same frequency. The transfer function reveals how the circuit modifies the input amplitude in creating the output amplitude. Thus, the transfer function completely describes how the circuit processes the input complex exponential to produce the output complex exponential. The circuit's function is thus summarized by the transfer function. In fact, circuits are often designed to meet transfer function specifications. Because transfer functions are complex-valued, frequency-dependent quantities, we can better appreciate a circuit's function by examining the magnitude and phase of its transfer function (Figure 2 <http://cnx.org/content/m0028/latest/#magphase#magphase>).WalterWalter Katz Chief Scientist Signal Integrity Software, Inc. wkatz@xxxxxxxxxx 303.449-2308
-- Bob Ross Teraspeed Consulting Group LLC Teraspeed Labs 121 North River Drive 13610 SW Harness Lane Narragansett, RI 02882 Beaverton, OR 97008 401-284-1827 503-430-1065 http://www.teraspeed.com 503-246-8048 Direct bob@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Teraspeed is a registered service mark of Teraspeed Consulting Group LLC ------------------------------------------------------------------ The IBIS Ad Hoc Interconnect Task Group Mailing ListArchives are available at: //www.freelists.org/archives/ibis-interconn
TO UNSUBSCRIBE:Send a message to "ibis-interconn-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" with a subject of "unsubscribe"
To administer your subscription status from the web, visit: //www.freelists.org/list/ibis-interconn