[ibis-interconn] IBIS Ad Hoc Interconnect Modeling Task Group - Aug. 15 Minutes and Sept. 26 Agenda

  • From: "Mirmak, Michael" <michael.mirmak@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <ibis-interconn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 14:21:22 -0700

======================================================================
IBIS INTERCONNECT MODELING AD HOC TASK GROUP MEETING MINUTES AND AGENDA

http://www.eda.org/ibis/adhoc/interconnect/

Mailing list: ibis-interconn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

======================================================================
Next Meeting
Wednesday, September 26, 2007

               Telephone     Bridge   Passcode
              916-356-2663     4      336-0321


LiveMeeting Details - NOTE: USE THE DETAILS BELOW ONLY IF THE OUTLOOK
  INVITATION LINKS FAIL

If you need to be added to the LiveMeeting, contact Michael Mirmak

  Subject: IBIS Ad Hoc Interconnect Meeting
  Meeting URL: https://www.livemeeting.com/cc/intel/join
  Meeting ID: 28RXND
  Meeting Key: sjXf|5#;5
  Role: Attendee

Agenda:
- Review of Touchstone(R) 2.0 draft 10
- Simple vs. complex ICM-IBIS interfacing

======================================================================

Minutes from August 15:

Attendees:
----------
(* denotes present)
Agilent                    - Radek Biernacki*, John Moore
Green Streak Programs      - Lynne Green
Intel                      - Michael Mirmak*
Mentor Graphics Corp.      - John Angulo*
Micron Technology          - Randy Wolff*
Teraspeed Consulting Group - Bob Ross* 

========================================================================
The team reviewed the latest version of the Touchstone 2.0 draft.
Radek expressed concerns that the 1.0 specification features may not be
completely explained in the 2.0 text.  He will review the text to make 
sure.

Bob suggested that consistency and clarity demand this document be
called
Touchstone(R) 2.0, not Touchstone2 or other variants.  This would mean 
preserving the name "Touchstone(R)" and investigating any legal
implications.
Michael agreed to this, and will update the document to refer to the
text as Version 2.0.

Randy suggested checking the capitalization of "version," enlarging the
font for the title and formatting the title page to be similar to IBIS.

The features suggested by Sam Chitwood of Sigrity and Bob Ross at
previous
meetings are being addressed as follows:

- [No. of Freq. Points] keyword: may be redundant but can be added in a
                                 future release

- Name as Touchstone 2.0: will be changed

- [Reference] keyword to wrap across CR/LF or LF boundary: will be added

- lower/upper half matrix format: will be added

- binary file compression: too complex; will not be added in this
revision

Separately, Michael will provide a write-up of the lower-half/upper-half
matrix options.  This can be "rolled into" the current draft once the
team agrees on the structure and operation of the new features.  He
previewed a copy of this during the meeting.

Radek commented that the proper equation for the number of data points
in the
matrix descriptions is "(n*(n+1)) + 1" where n is the number of ports.
Therefore, for a one-port matrix, three points are given (e.g.,
magnitude and
angle plus one frequency) but for a three-port matrix, 13 values are
given (e.g.,
six pairs of magnitude/angle data plus one frequency point).  Therefore,
the total number of data points should be "x*(n*(n+1)) + 1)" where
x is the number of frequency points. 

Radek also suggested keeping the phrase "row-wise" in the text when
describing the ordering of matrix data.  The ordering of matrix data
would then resemble the following, depending on whether lower- or upper-
half matrix data is specified:

LOWER-HALF                                                      
ROW-WISE                S11     S21     S22     S31     S32     S33

LOWER-HALF                                                      
COLUMN-WISE             S11     S21     S31     S22     S32     S33

UPPER-HALF              S11     S12     S22     S13     S23     S33
COLUMN-WISE                                                     

UPPER-HALF              S11     S12     S13     S22     S23     S33
ROW-WISE                                                        

The team will continue working on the revised drafts.

========================================================================

Team Objectives:
1) complete ICM-IBIS linking BIRD and any associated changes to the 
   ICM specification
2) update the ICM specification, if needed, to clarify the mapping of 
   ICM nodes to S-parameter ports
3) complete a specification for "Touchstone Plus" or similar 
   industry-standard definition for Touchstone-like files, to include 
   complex impedance references, removal of limits on the maximum number
   of ports and per-port impedance references 

Other related posts: