I was reviewing some old comments on the C_comp BIRD, which borrows much of the
same language from BIRD189. Credit goes to Curtis Clark for noticing this in
the C_comp BIRD. I realized I better check the Interconnect BIRD for the same
language...
Randy
From: ibis-interconn-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:ibis-interconn-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Walter Katz
Sent: Monday, July 03, 2017 5:25 PM
To: IBIS-Interconnect <ibis-interconn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [EXT] [ibis-interconn] Re: BIRD189.4 clarification
Randy,
Good catch!
This line should be:
"Number_of_terminals matches the number of terminals used in an associated
IBIS-ISS subcircuit, or the number of ports plus 1 (N+1) used in a
corresponding associated Touchstone file."
I would move this line, with the change I made, to the previous section
"Number_of_terminals rules:"
Walter
Walter Katz
wkatz@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:wkatz@xxxxxxxxxx>
Phone 303.449-2308
Mobile 303.335-6156
From:
ibis-interconn-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:ibis-interconn-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[mailto:ibis-interconn-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Randy Wolff ;(Redacted
sender "rrwolff" for DMARC)
Sent: Monday, July 3, 2017 4:09 PM
To: IBIS-Interconnect
<ibis-interconn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:ibis-interconn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: [ibis-interconn] BIRD189.4 clarification
I'm a little confused by a sentence found on page 20 of BIRD189.4 under the
Terminal_number section of Terminal line rules:
"This value will also match the number of terminals used in an associated
IBIS-ISS subcircuit, or the number of ports plus 1 (N+1) used in a
corresponding associated Touchstone file."
This sentence seems to be describing a requirement for the Number_of_terminals
rules. Thoughts?
Thanks,
Randy
