I believe there's a minor editorial issue with the usage of "platform" vs.
"operating system" and "architecture" in IBIS 6.1. While there are a few fixes
that could be made in this area, the most striking one is on page. 172:
The EDA tool will check for the compiler information and verify if the
executable model file is compatible with the operating system and platform.
Multiple occurrences, without duplication, of Executable are permitted to allow
for providing executable model files for as many combinations of operating
system platforms and compilers for the same algorithmic model.
I believe this should be:
The EDA tool will check for the compiler information and verify if the
executable model file is compatible with the platform (operating system and
architecture).
Multiple occurrences, without duplication, of Executable are permitted, to
support executable model files for many combinations of operating system,
architecture, and compiler for the same algorithmic model.
* MM
