[ibis-editorial] Re: A potential oversight in BIRD213.1

From: "Muranyi, Arpad" <Arpad_Muranyi@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: "ibis-editorial@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <ibis-editorial@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2022 18:35:27 +0000

Never mind, I just need better glasses...
Sorry for my confusion.

Thanks,

Arpad
===================================

From: ibis-editorial-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <ibis-editorial-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Behalf Of Muranyi, Arpad
Sent: Wednesday, October 5, 2022 11:09 PM
To: ibis-editorial@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ibis-editorial] A potential oversight in BIRD213.1

Hello Everyone,

I may have found an oversight in BIRD213.1. Note that it proposes to change
the clock_times
section as indicated by the yellow highlighted text:

[cid:image001.png@01D8DA51.A7DE75D0]

This attempts to include the PAM4 offsets in the definition of sample times
(correctly).
However, the BIRD also introduces a new offset parameter, called PAM_Offsets:

[cid:image002.png@01D8DA51.A7DE75D0]

which is not mentioned in the calculation of sample time above. Shouldn't this
new
parameter also be included in the calculation of sample time to include all PAM
cases?

Thanks,

Arpad
========================================================================

References:
- [ibis-editorial] A potential oversight in BIRD213.1
  - From: Muranyi, Arpad

[ibis-editorial] Re: A potential oversight in BIRD213.1

Other related posts: