[hipl-users] Re: Hipsetup failure
- From: Miika Komu <miika@xxxxxx>
- To: hipl-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2005 21:20:55 +0200 (EET)
On Fri, 4 Feb 2005, Mika Kousa wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Feb 2005, Irene Garcia Vargas wrote:
>
> -> Hi All,
> -> I get the sources from the new location,and could rebuild them with the new
> -> method.Since patching I can test well the HIP connection between two of my
> -> hosts with the {server/conntest-client-gai}-connect. (i.e.The status in
> -> the /proc/net/hip is ESTABLISHED, and I can write from one side to the
> -> other...)
> -> The hipsetup however doesn't succeed...
> -> I have pasted below the error that I got, any idea of what can be wrong it
> -> will be welcome!
> -> Regards,
> -> Irene
> ->
> -> ksat77:/home/igvargas/hipl--main--2.6/test# ./hipsetup -m
> -> -d /home/igvargas/hipl--main--2.6/ -i ksat92.domain.name
> ->
> -> ...
> -> {...modules intalllation...}
> -> ....
> ->
> -> make: Leaving directory `/home/igvargas/hipl--main--2.6/linux'
> -> insmod /lib/modules/2.6.9/kernel/net/ipv6/hip/hipmod.ko
> -> Using hostname: ksat77
> -> No key file given, use default
> -> HIT is 5b30:cb0e:14e6:1942:992f:552e:fb7:1338
> -> Initiator mode
> -> Connecting to peer host ksat92.domain.name
> -> Input some text, press enter and ctrl+d
> -> Trying to connect to 6844:bf2e:e1c:a50a:d83e:1a9a:2342:b9
> -> trying next
> -> failed to connect
Do you have a "server hipsetup" listening at ksat92.domain.name, i.e.,
"hipsetup -r"?
Can you copy-paste the contents of "/etc/hip/hosts" as it is (without any
modifications)? Thanks.
> The conntest-client-gai does the HIT-to-IP mapping before it issues the
> connect call. I have a vague feeling that this error might be because the
> conntest-client-gai program might call connect() just before the
> previously done HIT-to-IP mapping is completed in the kernel. This
> assumption needs to be investigated.
Untrue. Use the source, Luke...
> -> awk: warning: escape sequence `\ ' treated as plain ` '
>
> This awk bug has been around some time, but we just have not looked at it
> so closely yet (read: laziness).
May be solved in patch-9 (in the new archive). I am not completely sure
because I could not reproduce the problem. Try it out?
--
Miika Komu miika@xxxxxx http://www.iki.fi/miika/
Other related posts:
