> Diego seems to not like the '!= NULL' in checks so much... > > How else am I supposed to check a function pointer? Just leave out the '!= NULL' part: if (fptr) {... > Why does this function not check the option_list and modules parameters > for NULL > pointers? > > Shall I check every paramter for a possible NULL value and print an error > message? You shall check every parameter for a possible NULL value and at least return an error to caller. I guess an error message is unnecessary because it's the caller's fault to pass in a NULL pointer in the first place so they should prevent or handle it in the first place. The argument for such checks is that NULL pointers tend to crop up occasionally and, if unchecked, simply terminate the whole process via a beautiful segmentation fault. That makes users grumpy :-) I know, I know - this function is called by automatically generated code which should theoretically never pass in NULL pointers. I would recommend to still do those checks just in case this assumption changes and because it simply should be done everywhere. Stefan