Hi all, I've just read that many of you are concerned about the MIT license which allows proprietary software to "steal" OBOS code without giving anything back. In my opinion, we should be worried about something much more dangerous: fragmentation. I'm somewhat 'obsessed' by this problem... :) To me, we should change the license and add some clauses to deny the right to duplicate the whole work making little changes and renaming the product. In other words, we already avoided the fragmentation of packages (because OBOS comes with a full operating system, not like the Linux world where they have 12 window managers and so on), but I'd like to avoid the fragmentation of distributions too, which could - in some years - break the compatibility and confuse users. Or, if you really don't want to change a little the license, we could add - when OBOS R1 will be ready - a specific page on the site inviting everyone who has some ideas to discuss with us instead of forking OBOS... thanks :) Marco Zanon [http://www.marcozanon.com]