Ingo Weinhold <bonefish@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I fear this is going to be a monolog. ;-) > ... but who care... as long as I entertain myself. ;-) Ah well, the simple minds ;-)) > > The Jamfiles for bash and flex actually look OK. There must be > > another > > problem. I don't see where though -- the involved low-level rules > > (Objects, Object) seem to do the right thing, too. This requires > > some > > further analysis, I'm afraid. > The simple fact is, that I cannot reproduce this. So there's little I > can > investigate. I'm using Jam 2.5rc3, the version from the HEAD of our > CVS, BTW. If HEAD is the standard main repository, than I am using this, too :-) Bye, Axel.