"Ithamar R. Adema" <iradema@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The only thing is, either we make the driver _really_ messy with all > kinds of _BEOS_R5_COMPATIBILITY_ #ifdef's, or the code in SVN would > become Haiku specific (no longer able of providing R5-compatible > builds > of those modules). > > Am I overlooking another possible option? And if not, are willing to > sacrifice our R5 packages built from svn (for the SCSI modules only)? We could tag the original drivers or put them in a vendor branch to keep the originals. But beyond that, I agree with you and would also vote for 2). R5 compatibility is not really needed there, anymore. Bye, Axel.