Correct me if I'm wrong, but nothing stops BeOS from having some GPL drivers and nothing stops Linux from having some closed drivers... ----- Original Message ----- From: "Linus Almstrom" <linalm-7@xxxxxxxxxx> To: <openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Saturday, May 25, 2002 3:19 PM Subject: [openbeos] Re: OS Propaganda.... A new world order! > GPL restricts us not to port them, I guess. > > On 2002-05-25 at 19:41:16 [+0200], openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > Who said we couldn't use linux drivers ? > > Just need to take care about where we put it, but we definitely can port > > a linux driver. > > > > > > En réponse à Massimiliano Origgi <origgi@xxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > > > > >I want to shorten this to a few key points, then answer them: > > > >1) Drivers are a critical key to the success of OpenBeOS. > > > > > > >Agreed, to a degree. One thing that is a vast improvement in situation > > > is > > > >that there is more standardization in hardware. There are only a few > > > video > > > >cards out there, really - nVidia, Radeon, Matrox, etc. A lot of USB > > > devices > > > >(which are the future for many things) use standardized APIs (mass > > > storage, > > > >HCI, etc). So there will be fewer drivers to write than, say, 5 years > > > ago. > > > > > > Unless you have to work around broken implementations of standard > > > protocols : > > > -) > > > Anyway, yes, it's a lot easier (see cd burners as an example), moreover > > > if > > > there is the possibility to write a driver at all (read there is some > > > code or > > > a manual available), we can be pretty sure that a driver for BSD or > > > Linux > > > already exists and while we can't use Linux code directly it can be > > > 'consulted' for infos about the hardware, saving a LOT of time. > > > -- > > > > > > Massimiliano Origgi The future is blue with BlueOS > > > http://www.intuiware.com mailto:max@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > Squeezer 2.1 available! > > > WorkspaceSwitcher 2.1 available! > > > > > > > > > >