[openbeos] Re: Headers
- From: "David Reid" <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2002 19:11:11 +0100
Have a look at the posix headers. Loads of them simply include the Be
headers. what I'm saying is that it should be the other way round, whereby
we include the posix headers in the be headers where they're needed. It's
not a huge change, but a subtle one that I think makes sense. For most of
the C++ stuff it doesn't make a lot of difference.
david
----- Original Message -----
From: "Axel Dörfler" <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, June 01, 2002 9:04 PM
Subject: [openbeos] Re: Headers
> David wrote:
> > Hmm, well I don't really mind, but to my simple mind having just a
> > single
> > main directory for all headers seems like a better idea. However, I
> > don't
> > really mind and keeping it the old way may make sense for people
> > making the
> > switch.
> > What I do really want to do though is have the Be headers layered on
> > top of
> > the posix ones and not vice versa.
>
> That would make sense for parts that are indeed posix like, like the
> kernel, file system stuff, etc. - what are you thinking of?
> (networking?? ;-)))
>
> > BTW, I know you think I only care about the networking stuff, but
> > that's
> > totally wrong and I wasn't even thinking about the net stuff when I
> > wrote
> > the mail :)
>
> Hehe :-)
> Even if you had written that mail with networking in mind, it wouldn't
> think so to offend you ;-))
>
> Adios...
> Axel.
>
>
>
Other related posts:
