Stephan Assmus <superstippi@xxxxxx> wrote: > > Considering a system with only one OpenBFS partition, the first 3 > > disk > > blocks shoud be organized in this way? > I am not very knowledgable when it comes to this stuff, but it looks > correct to me. Maybe others have more insight? This would be correct for a DOS partitioned drive. The first partition would start at block 2 - but there is usually a gap of some blocks between the partition table and the start of the first partition to have space for boot loaders or other additional stuff. Also, you're assuming a block size of 512 bytes here, which might not be correct forever :-) BFS itself doesn't care about the first 512 bytes - it doesn't use it at all. The contents can be arbitrary; the BFS super block must be at offset 512, and is around 144 bytes long - the rest can be used arbitrarily as well. On x86 with BIOS, the stage 1 boot loader is placed in this free space, but it might not be used at all on other systems, for example PPC. Bye, Axel.