>I rarely use anything but fdisk, it's a standard command (even if the windows >one is strange); why not port it ? GUI for this type of thing is not needed fr the beginning. >Early versions of BeOS used LILO, I don't see why we couldn't use it. >a GDB port could be harder, but hey, it was even ported with Palm pilots as a >target :) (and yes gdb is a cmdline tool, but there are lot of gui wrappers, as DDD... which I heard is awsome). That would be OK for development builds, but you have to remember who BeOS was targetted at. I personally can use fdisk till my fingers bleed, but if your going to "stick with the spirit" of BeOS, it might need something close to a re-write. Actually, I would be glad for a rewrite, the original one sucks, and has wrecked many a partition of mine! After looking over openbeos.org I see that the boot loader seems to be covered by the Kernel team, so thats not an issue. >En réponse à Andrew Edward McCall <mccall@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > >> Hi, >> >> After a quick look back at the list archives there seems to be a gap in >> the areas covered by the OpenBeOS project. There doesn't seem to be any >> support tools such as hard disk partition programs and boot loaders and >> debuggers (I can't think of any others right now, but I am sure there >> will be some!) >> I realise that you should be able to use the original ones for a while, >> but obviously not when OpenBeOS gets turned into a complete OS. >> Are these going to be covered in the BFS or Kernel teams, or have these >> been "missed"? >> >> Thanks >> >> Andrew Edward McCall >> mccall@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx