Hello, Please add links of these free online books on the new haiku website. "Practical File System Design with the Be File System" http://www.nobius.org/~dbg/ Programming the Be Operating System http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/beosprog/book/ ----------- anil joy -----Original Message----- From: openbeos-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:openbeos-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Jonas Sundström Sent: Sunday, June 27, 2004 4:22 PM To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [openbeos] Re: bison and other build issues "Andrew Bachmann" <shatty@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Jérôme Duval <korli@xxxxxxxx> wrote: ... > > Some of the bin utilities i checked in are usually > > configured to find their > > system data files in a directory /usr/local/share. > > What should we do ? > > - /share and /boot/beos/share > > (need to add a /share link to the root ...) > > - /etc and /boot/beos/etc > > (not a common place but why not) > > - another directory ? > > I have no /boot/beos/share but I do have both > /boot/home/config/etc and /boot/home/config/share, > which would lead me to believe that we should > have a /boot/beos/share separate from /boot/beos/etc. FWIW, BeOS R5 doesn't have /boot/home/config/share. It's added by some 3'rd party apps. BTW, what's the reason for this semantical overlap?: /share and /usr ("unix shared resources" IIRC) I fear that if we start supporting all of the unix root folders our system will end up as cluttered as Linux. On the other hand, as the root is not visible from Tracker or from apps using the blessed Open/Save filepanels it's not necessarily a big problem. Ported apps that use some filepanel of their own would not hide a messy root though, and I think it's a good idea to avoid such a situation. /Jonas Sundström. www.kirilla.com