Stephan Assmus <superstippi@xxxxxx> wrote: > I have a question about the patch: > > +#define RETURN_AND_SET_ERRNO(status) \ > [...] > > With how the macro "RETURN_AND_SET_ERRNO" is defined, wouldn't it > result in > the function that you pass to the marco being called twice? Definitely, nice catch! Bye, Axel.
