[haiku-development] Re: undertanding syscall
- From: Ingo Weinhold <ingo_weinhold@xxxxxx>
- To: haiku-development@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2008 02:29:21 +0100
On 2008-12-05 at 22:21:08 [+0100], Romain <romain.haiku@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I look deeper at all the syscall chain and I think that I now see all parts
> involved.
> There is only one function that I could not find referenced at any place:
> "syscall_dispatcher" that is in "src/system/kernel/syscall.cpp". It seems
> to me that it
> is some obsolete code of a previous way to handle syscalls. The same seems
> to apply to
> the generated "syscall_dispatcher.h".
>
> Is that correct ?
It's not used for x86. It might be used for other architectures. Though we
never got far enough with the PPC port to have a userland (and thus no
syscalls), and I can't say how far François has pushed the m68k port.
CU, Ingo
Other related posts:
