[haiku-development] Re: SVN commit access for Wim van der Meer
- From: David McPaul <dlmcpaul@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: haiku-development@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 15:45:28 +1000
On 19 May 2010 02:46, Ingo Weinhold <ingo_weinhold@xxxxxx> wrote:
> On 2010-05-18 at 06:38:42 [+0200], Ryan Leavengood <leavengood@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>> On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 8:12 AM, Stephan Assmus <superstippi@xxxxxx> wrote:
>> >
>> > This email is to gauche feedback, perhaps we can see from the replies that
>> > everyone is in favor, or do we need an extra voting thread?
>>
>> I think it might just be simpler to use this as the voting thread, and
>> on that note: +1 from me.
>
> I'd prefer to keep actual voting threads formal, so that people only scanning
> the list subjects can make them out easily.
>
> But frankly, I think the commit access votes are pretty useless anyway, since
> I suspect that most people add their "+1" without actually having reviewed
> (as opposed to scanned for style violations) a single patch from the person
> in question. I'd be thrilled to learn that's not the case, though.
I have always felt that the call for a vote is more to see if anyone
objects than to get everyone to agree.
I prefer that if someone wants to work on the code then let them.
Right now more programmers is good even if they only do a little bit
here and there.
So it is an implicit +1 from me.
--
Cheers
David
Other related posts:
