Ingo Weinhold <ingo_weinhold@xxxxxx> wrote: > * Added BDataIO::[V]Print() methods for convenient printf() style > printing > to BDataIOs. That could also be solved by a BFormattedIO class that you can wrap around any other class. If one would also add parsing functionality, I think this would be the preferred way to go. > * Added experimental BFdIO and BFileIO, which are BPositionIO > implementations wrapping a given file descriptor respectively FILE*. I don't like the BFdIO name, but I don't have a good idea for a replacement either - or have only BFileIO, and have it accept an fd as well (the FILE* version could flush the stream, and directly write to its fd, for example). > * Added PrintToStream(BDataIO&) versions to BPoint, BRect, BRegion, > BMessage. Very welcome. > The new BDataIO methods eat up virtual slots. I suppose Print() could > actually be non-virtual -- at least I can't imagine why any derived > class > would want to do anything other than the default implementation (i.e. > construct a va_list and call VPrint()). > > The name for VPrint() is "inspired" by the C/POSIX API names. Another > option would be something more descriptive like PrintVarArgs(). I wouldn't mind either way. I think we could also add the Meta{Read|Write|...}() functions to BDataIO, they should be useful, too. Bye, Axel.