Hi, On 2010-02-03 at 00:09:22 [+0100], John Scipione <jscipione@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 5:02 PM, Axel Dörfler <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > John Scipione <jscipione@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> I have attached a new patch to ticket #5203 at > >> http://dev.haiku-os.org/ticket/5203 > >> > >> This patch will ensure that deskcalc will (almost) always fit the > >> result in the display window. An easy way to test the code is to make > >> the window short and wide and type pi or sin(0.5) and watch the digits > >> fill the screen. Then make the window tall and narrow and watch the > >> result come back puny and inaccurately. > > > > I know I'm a bit late with this objection, but I find it pretty strange > > to limit the computation accuracy to the window size. Can't we just > > make sure that the interesting part of the result is alway shown (and > > you'd have to scroll to get more accuracy)? > > Or does it internally still use the more accurate number for further > > computations? > > DeskCalc could be made to use some arbitrary accuracy independent of the > window size, in fact, that is how it worked before I began (32 digits). > But then the result may or may not fit in the text view which is ugly, > the cursor gets put at the rightmost end of the result (correctly) but > that is ugly because you can't see the beginning of the result without > resizing or scrolling. Scrolling is of course an option but doesn't > really solve the underlying problem. > > I could see imposing a maximum precision (lets say 32 digits) and not > calculating beyond that no matter what your window size is but I don't > see a reason why I should. Most users won't notice or care, for the few > who want more accuracy they'll be able to get it. Either way the result > will fit in the text view and look nice. IMHO, fitting the result makes a lot of sense, but maintaining the accuracy internally also makes a lot of sense. I haven't looked at your patch yet, but from imagination, it shouldn't be too hard to have both features, no? Best regards, -Stephan