On Mar 25, 2014 4:55 PM, "Ingo Weinhold" <ingo_weinhold@xxxxxx> wrote: > Anyway, it seems to me that to get a significant benefit out of supporting Secure Boot one would have to go to great length. I'm less and less convinced that it is worthwhile to consider it at all. And with it making package signing anything more than an optional feature mainly targeted at third parties. +1, I frankly don't see the point of most of this myself, it's certainly not functionality I'd voluntarily use at least, or be willing to see enabled in a default build. Regards, Rene