On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 09:44:57AM +0100, Axel D wrote: > Pete Goodeve<pete.goodeve@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > However are you sure that BSynth's soundfont should be a fixed system > > component? > > > As many other system services, BSynth should collect the sound files it finds > in the respective user/common/system folder, and that list would then be > presented to the user in a preferences application. No symlinks involved, but > a settings file, apparently. Sounds good. That's the way I'll proceed, I guess. A symlink was always a bit of a necessary kludge anyway, because the synth is finding the soundfont through a fixed name, but it would at least be very impolite to rename an author's product ("TimGM6mb.sf2" in this case) to that! > > Furthermore, the current sound file could just be a separate package that the > user can remove if wanted. I think this is what I was saying -- that it should be removable rather than a fixed part of the system. But if there's a scan to present all the possibilities in a preference, that scan might as well include /boot/system/data/synth as well, so if it's decided to put a soundfont there, the synth will find it. -- Pete --