"Niels Reedijk" <niels.reedijk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The goal of alpha 1 is _not_ to create a perfect operating system > that > works on all the hardware out there, but rather to create a stable > enough system for developers to play with, early adopters to test on, > and BeOS/Haiku freaks to enjoy as a preview of what is to come. My > translation of this is that unsupported hardware does not qualify as > an issue, but issues of data loss do. Pretty much. But it's also important that it runs on as many hardware out there as possible - ie. a driver should not pretend to support a given device when it in fact does not, and only causes problems (not sure if there are any cases left of this). > Note that the actual implementation is up to you. Bummer ;-) > To prioritize the different issues, I think there should be a > separation between must-haves, and really-want-to-haves. I suggest > using the 'priority' field for that. Hmm, I don't think we need to repurpose the priority field for that. There is already the milestone R1/alpha which should be pretty self explaining - plus, the standard priority levels we are giving fit pretty well, too (not that they differ that much, anyway). In the end, only blocker tickets are really non-discussable. > I would like to ask everyone to please evaluate everything before > next > Monday (the 25th). We can then continue the discussion on the alpha 1 > release. Not sure if I'll find the time, but I'll try. Bye, Axel.