On 2011-01-19 at 16:22:20 [+0100], Stephan Aßmus <superstippi@xxxxxx> wrote: > Am 19.01.2011 14:17, schrieb Axel Dörfler: > > Ingo Weinhold<ingo_weinhold@xxxxxx> wrote: > >> On 2011-01-18 at 14:34:01 [+0100], Oliver Tappe<zooey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> wrote: > >>> So, is there anything that speaks against making BObjectList public? > >> The interface needs revision. The base class _PointerList_ is really > >> ugly. > >> The class (like BList) is misnamed IMO. All that doesn't exactly speak > >> against making it public, but it should at least marked obsolescent at > >> the > >> same time. > > > > I would just make it public as is now, and phase it out with the GCC4 API > > switch. > > Fully agreed. Ok, thanks for the input - I have cleaned up BObjectList a bit and made it public. As I haven't found any hints on binary compatibility of the STL either, I'm going to keep them out of all public headers. cheers, Oliver