On 11/01/2011 05:10 PM, François Revol wrote:
Le 01/11/2011 12:00, Axel Dörfler a écrit :On second thought (after another look at the code), the transaction should actually automatically become a child transaction of the current transaction (if any). So this should actually work fine -- I assume you have tested the outcome of the patch, at least to found my understanding of the code I wrote a while back with more substance? :-)Well both versions seemed to work fine.
That's good enough, I guess :-)FWIW I like the current version a bit better, as it's more obviously correct.
BTW you have not yet forgotten about the STL list problem you introduced in the mail_daemon recently when you fixed that crash?