On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 3:45 AM, Ingo Weinhold <ingo_weinhold@xxxxxx> wrote: > Either that or change the ReleaseReference() return type to int32 as well. > While I haven't encountered a case yet where the exact count is of interest, > it would at least be imaginable. E.g. when one or more entities are known to > hold a reference and one would decide for disposing the object at a reference > count greater than 0. On the other hand one wouldn't really make use of the > BReferenceable features anymore. But then again a subclass used like this > might be used like a normal referenceable in a different context, and it > would be a little stupid to introduce another reference counting facility for > the first purpose. > Will change that after work (or someone else can before that if they're feeling motivated). Regards, Rene