Jérôme Duval<korli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > 2011/3/9 Alexander von Gluck <kallisti5@xxxxxxxxxxx>: > > should i reverse merge 40886? > I would reverse it indeed. As I said, I'm okay with the changes, as they allow to disable the output completely, which is not the case in the original; I haven't seen any problems with printf() yet, anyway. In any case, we could just implement it like dprintf() in the kernel, too. Bye, Axel.